Search for: "Li v. Department of Homeland Security et al"
Results 1 - 7
of 7
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm
” The State Department explained that “[d]isclosure of [the documents] . . . risk[ed] circumvention of the law because terrorists . . . could use [them to formulate strategies for] conceal[ing] derogatory information, provid[ing] fraudulent information, or otherwise circumvent[ing] the security checks . . . . [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 11:33 am
In another, Logan Alters, et al. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 2:07 pm
Such is the case in Ninestar Corporation et al. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 12:41 pm
Although the investigation established that the Russian government perceived it would benefit from a Trump presidency and worked to secure that outcome, and that the Campaign expected it would benefit electorally from information stolen and released through Russian efforts, the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 5:04 pm
In January, it declined to hear a long-running case - Abigail Alliance for Better Access to Developmental Drugs, et al. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 3:01 pm
Trial attorneys – who often later become immigration judges – are employed by the Department of Homeland Security and are part of U.S. [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 3:01 pm
Trial attorneys – who often later become immigration judges – are employed by the Department of Homeland Security and are part of U.S. [read post]
